Skip Navigation LinksProPrint > News > Sydney printer faces court over pregnancy discrimination case
Wednesday Sep 08, 2010

Search Jobs

Latest Jobs

See more jobs at jobs.printweek.com

Business

Sydney printer faces court over pregnancy discrimination case

Sydney printer faces court over pregnancy discrimination case
by
Jul 7, 2010
Find more like: Sydney | printer | faces | court | over | pregnancy | discrimination | case

A Sydney printing business could face over $30,000 in fines after a pregnancy discrimination case was launched against it in the Federal Court.

Wongtas Pty Ltd, trading as Goldshining Graphics & Printing, based in Riverwood, NSW and its two directors, Ding Guo Wang and Xiao Yu Zhang, are facing court.

The complainant is a 36-year-old Chinese-born woman who claims to have been discriminated against and subsequently asked to leave her job after falling pregnant.

Acting Fair Work Ombudsman Leigh Johns said the agency was seeking penalties against the company and its directors for alleged contraventions of workplace law and compensation for the former employee for her losses.

Wongtas faces a maximum penalty of $33,000 per breach and Mr Wang and Ms Zhang each face a maximum penalty of $6,600 per breach.

Shortly after informing her employer of her pregnancy the woman was moved into a lower paid packing role that required her to stand on her feet all day.

She claimed she was eventually given a written warning about her performance at which point she contacted the Fair Work Infoline.

After Fair Work Infoline intervened, it is alleged the woman was moved to another position in another store, but was given her notice three days before Christmas.

The woman has not worked since, and according to court documents, has suffered both economic and personal loss as a result of the alleged discrimination.

The news comes as the Fair Work Ombudsman announced a national campaign aimed at helping women avoid pregnancy discrimination at work.

The case is listed for first directions on 18 August.

Wongtas Pty Ltd declined to comment to ProPrint prior to the court case.

Click here for the latest headlines from across the printing industries.



Want to secure a $1000 bonus? Tell us what it's really like to work in print...

Ads by Google


What are your thoughts on this article? Have your say and leave your comments below.

Your opinions are welcome but please stay within our Forum Rules. Offending posts will be removed and your access may be suspended. Abusive or obscene language will not be tolerated. The comments below do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of ProPrint, Haymarket Media or its employees.

Poll

Do Australian companies have a responsibility to buy print onshore?
 
Heidleberg
 
Presstek
 
Popular Articles
Click Here

Latest Comments

ProPrint Magazine

ProPrint Magazine

August 2010